Southern Shores of Singapore
about our shores: galleries | stories & visitor info | media articles
 
The Straits Times, 26 Nov 04

Anti-casino groups keep up the fight
By Joyce Teo

Various outfits are pushing case publicly and in private for the idea to be dropped

RELIGIOUS and other conservative groups have been lobbying the Government, both openly and behind the scenes, against building a casino here. They have argued passionately not just at open forums and via letters to The Straits Times Forum page, but also by making their opposition known to the powers-that-be on the quiet.

Some church leaders have even called on their flock to speak up as individuals. They have not given up even though many believe the Government has almost decided to go ahead with the casino, which was mooted in March and has divided public opinion.

One of the most active groups is Focus on the Family, which has written letters to Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong, when he was Prime Minister, and to Members of Parliament. 'In Singapore, making a lot of noise in the public arena doesn't go very far,' said president Tan Thuan Seng of the local offshoot of a United States-based movement that promotes Christianity by preserving traditional values. 'So we are doing it quietly, writing directly to them.'

The Singapore Islamic Scholars and Religious Teachers Association (Pergas) has also made its objections known to the Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs Yaacob Ibrahim. So has Muis (the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore and the highest authority on Islam here).

At least two Christian leaders have urged church members to air their views in the press. Pastor Cheah Fook Meng from the fundamentalist Covenant Evangelical Reformed Church said when two members raised the matter, he told them to write to this newspaper's Forum page. President of the National Council of Churches of Singapore, Bishop John Chew, also encouraged his Anglican believers here to do this.

This helped to make the debate on the casino, proposed as part of a giant resort, the hottest topic this year on the letters page, said Forum editor Kong Soon Wah. The deluge came after Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, Acting Minister for Community Development, Youth and Sports and Senior Minister of State for Trade and Industry, last week called for the debate to move beyond 'money versus values' to whether Singaporeans can act responsibly.

Although a survey has shown that slightly more people support the casino than not, more than 40 readers in the past week who wrote in were 'overwhelmingly against' it, said Mr Kong. The groups have also turned up at public forums, including paying $100 to attend one held by the Institute of Policy Studies last week. Bishop Chew said he was unsure if their views would be considered but they had to plug away nevertheless. 'Why should we stop?,' Focus on the Family's Mr Tan said. 'Just because it's a 95 per cent done deal, it doesn't mean the 5 per cent won't change the situation.'

But the groups are cautious not to step over what they see as the fine line where religion is mixed with politics. Bishop Chew said: 'We do not want to be seen as lobbying and pressurising the Government.'

The Singapore Buddhist Federation and the Hindu Endowments Board (HEB) have also voiced their reservations.

  website©ria tan 2003 www.wildsingapore.com