Southern Shores of Singapore
about our shores: galleries | stories & visitor info | media articles
 
AFP, 5 May 04

S'pore casino plans spark rare public debate

SINGAPORE (AFP) - The Singapore government's move towards legalising casinos has generated much excitement within the international gaming industry, but sparked rare community and political dissent in the tightly controlled city-state.

The government announced in March it was considering allowing a casino to be built on its Sentosa tourist resort island in an effort to boost tourism. Although the government has yet to give the project the green light and say a decision might still be nine months away, ministers have made strong public statements in recent weeks in favour of setting up the casino.

The head of gaming and wagering research at ABN Amro in Australia, Sean Monaghan, told AFP the global casino industry had been paying close attention to developments in Singapore. "Every gambling company that I have spoken to would be interested in participating in Singapore -- every one of them," Monaghan said. "If the regulatory structure is competitive and if the government is serious about establishing a casino industry in Singapore, it could be very, very, very successful."

But the issue has sparked a vigorous debate in Singapore, which is normally better known for its population's consistent acquiescence to the ruling People's Action Party's agenda.

At least five government MPs spoke out in parliament last month against the plan, with many warning legalising casinos would have dire social consequences. "I believe that Singapore can open up as a society without opening the door to gambling and the problems it brings," said Irene Ng, a government MP who is one of the more vocal opponents of the casino plan. "The revenue that may be generated will not be worth it. Anyway, since when has gambling become an indicator of social liberalisation and individual freedom? For those addicted, it is a shackle and a trap," she told AFP.

Gan Kim Yong is another government MP concerned about the prospect of a casino opening in Singapore. "While there have been legalised gambling activities here such as horse racing and lottery, the accessibility and frequency have always been somewhat limited. The casino is different in that it is accessible at any time," Gan told AFP. "It may also give the impression that the government is relaxing its policy on gambling. The end result is that more people may get into gambling. This is not desirable as it may lead to more people facing financial crisis, family problems, etc."

The government has acknowledged the grass-roots concerns and said one option would be to bar middle-class and poor Singaporeans from the casino, targetting it only at local high-flyers and foreigners. But this too has generated frustration among locals, some of whom feel the government gives preferential treatment to the nation's army of more than one million foreign workers.

"The feedback from the average Singaporean is negative. They're not very happy about the idea that if (casinos are to be legalised), by some regulations they will be excluded from it," another government MP, S. Iswaran, told AFP.

ABN Amro's Monaghan also said a decision to exclude Singaporeans from the casino could backfire, saying one reason global industry players are keen on investing in Singapore is because of the locals. "(Singapore) has a wealthy local population that loves to gamble, and it is located in the heart of a region full of people that also like to gamble," he said.

Industry analyst Kelvin Tan from Manila-based Sinorex Holdings told AFP a casino was becoming an essential part of all Asian nations' strategies to attract tourists and business delegates. "The government wants to bring in new investment to Sentosa, but foreign investors won't invest unless it is in a lucrative business like gaming," Tan said. "Sentosa will be planned along the line of Las Vegas, a first class convention and entertainment centre. I think what the government has realised is that if it doesn't come up with something it will lose convention business to Macau."

But MP Gan disagreed, saying there were other ways of attracting tourists. "I do not think that the casino is an essential element of the tourism industry," he said. "For example, can we attract a major international theme park such as the Universal Studio to Sentosa? Can we convert an island into a holiday beach resort like Phuket?"

  website©ria tan 2003 www.wildsingapore.com